Get the ChemPriceHub app — track prices on the go. Membership syncs across app & web. View plans
We value your privacy
We use cookies and similar technologies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and deliver personalized content. You can choose to accept or reject non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Notice.

Cookie Preferences

Manage your cookie preferences. Essential cookies are always enabled for the site to function. You can change your choice at any time via the "Cookie Settings" link in the footer. Read our Privacy Notice for full details.

Essential Cookies

Required for basic site functionality, including anti-spam protection and session management. Always active.

Analytics Cookies

Help us understand how visitors interact with the site. We use Google Analytics to improve our service. Disabling this will not affect essential functionality.

Welcome to ChemPriceHub

 
Home > News > ChemPriceHub Alert: China's Sulfur Port Inventory Rises to 1.929 Million Tons
sulfur score

ChemPriceHub Alert: China's Sulfur Port Inventory Rises to 1.929 Million Tons

Published on 2026-01-16

China Sulfur Port Inventory (January 16): Total inventory 1.929 million tons: Fangcheng Port 535,000 tons, Beihai Port 59,000 tons, Zhanjiang Port 280,000 tons, Zhenjiang Port 747,000 tons, Nanjing Port 40,000 tons, Dafeng Port 210,000 tons. PriceSeek Analysis on Sulfur, Bull-Bear Score: -1. The report dated January 16, 2026, indicates that China's sulfur port inventory reached 1.929 million tons, distributed across Fangcheng Port (535,000 tons), Beihai Port (59,000 tons), Zhanjiang Port (280,000 tons), Zhenjiang Port (747,000 tons), Nanjing Port (40,000 tons), and Dafeng Port (210,000 tons). The high inventory level reflects ample supply, which may exacerbate market supply-demand imbalances, exerting downward pressure on spot sulfur prices and strengthening buyer wait-and-see sentiment. A score of -1 indicates a generally bearish outlook, as the inventory increase directly constrains upward momentum in spot prices. However, it does not reach an extreme surplus level, hence not rated lower at -1.5 or -2.

Comments

0
No comments yet.