Get the ChemPriceHub app — track prices on the go. Membership syncs across app & web. View plans
 
Home > News > Cost and Profit Analysis of Vinyl Acetate on November 12, 2026

Cost and Profit Analysis of Vinyl Acetate on November 12, 2026

Published on 2026-11-12

Chempricehub reported on November 12:

For ethylene-based vinyl acetate monomer (VAM), the weekly average price of glacial acetic acid in Jiangsu was 3,781 yuan/ton, and the weekly average price of ethylene in Northeast Asia was $1,248/ton. Based on Chempricehub’s cost estimation formula, the theoretical production cost for ethylene-based VAM this week is 7,518.58 yuan/ton. The current weekly average ex-factory price for Shanghai Petrochemical’s ethylene-based VAM in East China is 7,360 yuan/ton, resulting in a theoretical weekly gross margin of -187.63 yuan/ton.

For calcium carbide-based VAM, the weekly average price of glacial acetic acid in North China was 3,945 yuan/ton, and the weekly average price of calcium carbide in Northwest China was 2,500 yuan/ton. According to Chempricehub’s cost estimation formula, the theoretical production cost for calcium carbide-based VAM this week is 6,461.5 yuan/ton. The current market price for Changcheng Energy Chemical’s VAM in Jiangsu is 7,310 yuan/ton, yielding a theoretical weekly gross margin of 848.50 yuan/ton.

In another scenario for calcium carbide-based VAM, with the weekly average price of glacial acetic acid in North China at 2,559 yuan/ton and calcium carbide in Northwest China at 2,550 yuan/ton, the theoretical production cost calculated using Chempricehub’s formula is 5,443.30 yuan/ton. With the current price of Changcheng Energy Chemical’s VAM in Jiangsu at 5,700 yuan/ton, the theoretical weekly gross margin stands at 156.70 yuan/ton.

Comments

0
  • Sarah Mitchell 2026-11-12 20:06
    The split in VAM margins highlights divergent feedstock cost pressures. While ethylene routes face losses, calcium carbide pathways maintain healthy profitability. This structural gap may shift downstream demand toward c..
No comments yet.