Get the ChemPriceHub app — track prices on the go. Membership syncs across app & web. View plans

Welcome to ChemPriceHub

 
Home > News > Who are the biggest winners and losers from sulfur's historic price rally in Chi...

Who are the biggest winners and losers from sulfur's historic price rally in China's chemical industry?

Elena Vasquez
Published on 2026-08-17

Who are the biggest winners and losers from sulfur's historic price rally in China's chemical industry?
The sulfur price surge is creating stark winners and losers. On the winning side, producers with captive, low-cost sulfur recovery are minting money. Sinopec leads with 8.34 million tons/year capacity, including the Puguang gas field producing at roughly 200 yuan/ton—every 100 yuan/ton price increase adds 500-600 million yuan to annual net profit. PetroChina (3.68 million tons) and Rongsheng Petrochemical (1.21 million tons) follow with similarly low costs and margins above 90%. Losers include phosphate fertilizer makers without captive phosphate rock or acid plants—each ton of DAP/MAP now carries 1,440 yuan more sulfur cost than at the start of the year—and sulfate-route titanium dioxide producers consuming 4 tons of sulfuric acid per ton of product. Some fertilizer firms are integrating downstream into fluorides and iron phosphate to add value, but the shakeout is accelerating: high-cost, externally dependent producers face cash losses and may exit, consolidating the market among integrated players.

Comments

0
  • Sarah Mitchell 2026-08-18 21:59
    Don't overlook the food-safety angle: industrial-grade sulfur is strictly banned in food processing due to heavy metal impurities like arsenic and lead, yet media exposés show it being used on goji berries and star anise. This regulatory risk could tighten supply further if enforcement intensifies, as food-grade sulfur requires higher purification. For traders, this adds another layer of complexity—quality certification is becoming as important as price in sourcing decisions.
No comments yet.